Power ≠ energy.
A proposed gigawatt connection measures capacity. Annual terawatt-hours measure energy. Turning one into the other needs assumptions about use, ramp-up and timing.
RESEARCH / ELECTRICITY & ENVIRONMENT
Electricity is physical. “AI demand” is a definition.
Start by separating the two.
FIRST, THE DENOMINATOR.
Data centers also serve storage, business software and other computing. A company-wide electricity total is another boundary again. These categories can overlap; they cannot simply be added together.
The IEA’s April 2026 Base Case separates all data-center electricity from AI-focused facilities. Both figures below are 2030 projections, not current meter readings. IEA report, Figure 1.5, pp.25–26 ↗
Worldwide electricity demand from all data centers in 2030.
IEA Base Case · Projection · April 2026
A subset, not an additional 465 TWh.
Training and inference are not separately allocated here.
THREE DISTINCTIONS
A proposed gigawatt connection measures capacity. Annual terawatt-hours measure energy. Turning one into the other needs assumptions about use, ramp-up and timing.
A power agreement can cover existing generation, a proposed project or environmental attributes. Its nameplate capacity is not proof of an operating facility.
A national electricity share cannot settle local questions about water, air quality, noise, bills or infrastructure. Place and time belong beside the annual total.
WHAT WE WANT TO FOLLOW
Follow a number from a company disclosure to the relevant region or site. Keep actual consumption, requested grid service and proposed generation separate. Where an AI-only allocation is not disclosed, the honest answer is a visible gap.
Explore sources and notes →Institutional modeling and corporate disclosures have different authority and incentives. This comparison covers the electricity projections listed here. Water use, emissions, and local impacts require separate measures.